On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 04:46 +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > busybox needs crypt() if CONFIG_USE_BB_CRYPT is not defined. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc b/meta/recipes- > core/busybox/busybox.inc > index 8c6dbbaf9b..a8ba10d21c 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc > @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ DESCRIPTION = "BusyBox combines tiny versions of many > common UNIX utilities into > HOMEPAGE = "http://www.busybox.net"; > BUGTRACKER = "https://bugs.busybox.net/"; > > -DEPENDS += "kern-tools-native" > +# Depend on virtual/crypt in case CONFIG_USE_BB_CRYPT is not defined > +DEPENDS += "kern-tools-native virtual/crypt"
I'm not a bug fan of adding dependencies which might not be needed. How common is CONFIG_USE_BB_CRYPT not being defined? I assume that isn't our default config? Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
