On 2018年08月29日 17:18, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
-SECURITY_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong ${SECURITY_PIE_CFLAGS} 
${lcl_maybe_fortify} ${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
-SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS ?= "-fstack-protector-strong ${lcl_maybe_fortify} 
${SECURITY_STRINGFORMAT}"
+FSTACK_PROTECTOR ?= "-fstack-protector-strong"
May I suggest to call it SECURITY_STACK_PROTECTOR instead? That aligns
it better with the other variables.

I am no objection on it, after collection the reply, I

will send V2 to tweak it

//Hongxu

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to