On 09/18/2018 12:59 PM, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hi Marek, Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:38 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >> On 09/18/2018 12:22 PM, Leon Woestenberg wrote: >>> >>> There is no exception for INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE in >>> kernel-fitimage.bbclass. The initramfs will be packed inside the FIT, >>> in addition of also being packed inside the kernel. >> >> So why would you use initramfs_image_bundle with fitImage when you can >> pack the initrd into the fitImage instead ? >> > To be honest, I do not know that use-case anymore but it's a valid > configuration that shouldn't give an unexpected outcome. True > We also found a use-case for non-compressed kernels in the FIT image; > that was for very small delta-upgrades even when kernels are FIT > packed. Currently kernel-fitimage.bbclass hard-selects a compressed > kernel (such as zImage). Patches are welcome -- Best regards, Marek Vasut -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core