On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 16:22 +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Error verifying signature: Failed to execute gpg. > > > > Am 17.09.2018 um 21:03 schrieb Patchwork <[email protected] > > mbedded.org>: > > > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: python3{,-native}: update to 3.7.0 (rev3) > > Revision: 3 > > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/13851/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. > > This is > > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the > > proposed > > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > > > > > * Issue Added patch file is missing Upstream-Status in > > the header [test_upstream_status_presence_format] > > Suggested fix Add Upstream-Status: <Valid status> to the header > > of meta/recipes- > > devtools/python/python3/uuid_when_cross_compiling.patch > > Standard format Upstream-Status: <Valid status> > > Valid status Pending, Accepted, Backport, Denied, > > Inappropriate [reason], Submitted [where] > > > > > > > > If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please > > reply to the > > mailing list ([email protected]) raising > > your concerns. > > Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and > > submitting a new > > version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you > > add/increment the > > version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH > > v2] -> > > [PATCH v3] -> ...). > > > > --- > > Guidelines: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Mess > > age_Guidelines > > Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest > > Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest > > -oe > > I understand this policy. I have an issue wrt. this particular one. > Why? Well - the patch seems to be reasonable submitted to upstream, > since it's a > quirk and likely an error. OTOH - supporting Yocto and OpenEmbedded > in getting > software up-to-date is one thing - having my name in the Python > contributors is > something complete different. > > Please find someone else doing that.
Nobody is saying it has to be submitted upstream, although we obviously do appreciate anyone doing that a lot. We do ask any patches which get added have a status though so we have some idea what is happening to them. So in this case the status would be "Pending". Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
