On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:44 AM, <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 13:42 +0000, mikko.rap...@bmw.de wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:38:36PM +0100, richard.purdie@linuxfoundat >> ion.org wrote: >> > I was replying from the perspective of how this should work in >> > general. >> > I agree that for this to work with a kernel recipe we do need the >> > change that started this thread and that is probably a reasonable >> > thing >> > to do. >> >> Good, then my patch is not going in the wrong direction. >> >> Remaining problem is if file overwrites will be detected or not so >> that >> accidental overrides of files in linux-libc-headers from kernel >> recipes >> should not be possible... > > That is a general problem and the core sstate code shouldn't let that > happen these days so I think that is already covered?
Yep, it should be covered. I was just looking for confirmation. Can everyone have a look at: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5305 And confirm that it can be closed by this .. ? I suggested my approach in that bug, but it never went anywhere at the time. Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core