I'm tempted to run the following over the metata to convert the bb.data.*Var(...,d) and similar expressions to the form d.*Var(...).
Why? We get a lot of people doing copy, paste and edit of the code and this way, we'll increase the chances of them finding better examples. I'm still looking at the diff this generates to see if there are any more corner cases I need to tweak the expression for but feedback welcome. sed \ -e 's:bb.data.\(setVar([^,]*,[^,]*\), \([^ )]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(setVarFlag([^,]*,[^,]*,[^,]*\), \([^) ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(getVar([^,]*\), \([^, ]*\) *,\([^)]*\)):\2.\1,\3):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(getVarFlag([^,]*,[^,]*\), \([^, ]*\) *,\([^)]*\)):\2.\1,\3):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(getVarFlag([^,]*,[^,]*\), \([^) ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(getVar([^,]*\), \([^) ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -i `grep -ril bb.data *` Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
