On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:39 AM Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 12:28, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 12:59:37PM +0200, Andrej Valek wrote: >> > This init feature was introduced via >> > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-January/116109.html >> > which is from 2016. Busybox has this runlevel applet available from 2005. >> > >> > I think, Raj was trying to make this system really tiny. So, I am not >> > sure, what would be the impact, if we dropped this runlevel script. >> >> OK, fair enough. I don't use busybox init anyway. >> >> I was just curious, because there is also runlevel from upstart which we were >> using (and I have u-a for runlevel in busybox.bbappend because of that). >> So I was surprised that there is actually 3rd implementation as OE >> specific shell script. > > > Khem, do you have an opinion? I suspect that shell script including comment > is longer than the compiled size of the runlevel applet in busybox... We > could simplify by just having the applet and removing that runlevel stub.
we should enable runlevel unconditionally when selecting busybox init and delete the file that I added for runlevel, that way we will be inline with busybox for this applet. > > Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
