On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 11:01, <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm a little worried about why we're having to create these links when > other software seems able to expect these things by default. Is this > some standard packaging most distros do? I'm a little worried we're > creating an ABI here which doesn't exist...
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=14904908 says that Fedora's boost-python3 package contains just /usr/lib64/libboost_python3.so.1.66.0. Their spec file at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boost/blob/master/f/boost.spec is hairy (as one expects for Boost) but doesn't appear to rename the file. So the question is why does our build produce libboost_python35.so? Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
