Martin,
On 11/6/18 2:04 AM, Martin Hundebøll wrote: > Play the whack-a-mole game and add the .file directive to another > assembly file that otherwise shows itself in ld-2.28.so debug file, > which in turns alters the build-id of ld-2.28.so on target. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Hundebøll <[email protected]> > --- > > Changes since v1: > > - Added signed-of-by tag > > .../0034-inject-file-assembly-directives.patch | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git > a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0034-inject-file-assembly-directives.patch > b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0034-inject-file-assembly-directives.patch > index 3f9f8cf189..55eba2d43e 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0034-inject-file-assembly-directives.patch > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0034-inject-file-assembly-directives.patch > @@ -257,3 +257,16 @@ index 244d87fb6d..14d3e2ce14 100644 > /* Initial entry point code for the dynamic linker. > The C function `_dl_start' is the real entry point; > its return value is the user program's entry point. */ Please add Upsteam-Status: and Signed-off-by: in the patch itself. You may want to review https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines This seems like a backport candidate for Thud too? regards, Armin > +diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S > b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S > +index d26ad1f8d3..a0de10bf81 100644 > +--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S > ++++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S > +@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ > + ARM unwind tables for register to register moves, the actual opcodes > + are not defined. */ > + > ++ .file "libc-do-syscall.S" > ++ > + #if defined(__thumb__) > + .thumb > + .syntax unified -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
