On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 09:06 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 12 nov. 2011, om 09:03 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 08:35 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc | 1 + > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc > >> b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc > >> index afea5e7..79785fb 100644 > >> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc > >> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc > >> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_update-alternatives ?= > >> "update-alternatives-cworth" > >> # > >> # Default recipe providers > >> # > >> +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_alsa-lib ?= "alsa-lib" > >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_dbus-glib ?= "dbus-glib" > >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_dbus-glib-native ?= "dbus-glib-native" > >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_gdk-pixbuf ?= "gdk-pixbuf" > > > > What else is providing "alsa-lib"? This sounds like a bug :/ > > According to Sau!: > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies > NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime libasound (alsa-lib, > alsa-lib-nativesdk) > NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match libasound
Which is a bug. alsa-lib-nativesdk should provide libasound-nativesdk, not libasound. >NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime alsa-conf-base (alsa-lib, >alsa-lib-nativesdk) >NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match alsa-conf-base ditto. Lets fix the underlying bug please :) Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
