On 11 nov 2011, at 18:36, "Saul Wold" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 12:17 AM, Anders Darander wrote: >> The updates to patch busybox-udhcpc-no_deconfig.patch is not fully verified. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anders Darander<[email protected]> >> --- >> .../B921600.patch | 0 >> .../busybox-appletlib-dependency.patch | 0 >> .../busybox-udhcpc-no_deconfig.patch | 66 +++-- >> .../{busybox-1.18.5 => busybox-1.19.3}/defconfig | 271 >> +++++++++++++------- > What kind of changes did you make to the defconfig? > Are thy just reflective of the updated version or did you make addition > modifications to enable/disable various configurations? There might be some new feature that's been enabled. I haven't actively enabled/disabled any features; new features (not defined in the old defconfig) have their default values. So, yes, the changes are only reflecting the updated busybox version. > I did notice this in particular which may be different in different configs: > > -CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX="" > -CONFIG_EXTRA_CFLAGS="" > +CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX="i586-oe-linux-" > +CONFIG_EXTRA_CFLAGS=" -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types" > > This might be different for a poky or other distro based build Thanks for spotting this. The defconfig update was made just before submitting the RFC. Most of the testings has been performed using custom configs, or just running with the old defconfig. I'll make sure to go over these before submitting the next revision. Cheers, Anders _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
