On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:07 PM Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 00:42, Brad Bishop <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I wonder if this is something they would be interested in upstream. I’ve > > copied > > the oe-core mailing list for possible comment. > > Thanks for forwarding this to us. The class is very simple and just does: > > PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS += " AR=${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc-ar \ > RANLIB=${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc-ranlib" > > That's quite an abuse of PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS, I'd recommend just > setting AR and RANLIB directly in the class, they'll override the > defaults in bitbake.conf. > > That however leads to the question of should we just change the > defaults? Does anything break if we use gcc-ar instead of ar?
Dont think that is a good idea in general since gcc-ar is a wrapper around normal ar passing --plugin=/path/to/lto/plugin/so and that may not be right thing to do always. > > Ross > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
