Op 15 nov. 2011, om 15:42 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:59 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 15 nov. 2011, om 14:43 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: >>> To put this quite simply, I think there is no good reason we shouldn't >>> use the mechanism we've selected to handle this kind of problem. We >>> should have defaults the reflect backwards compatibility. Other than >>> that where is the problem other than a general objection to >>> PACKAGECONFIG? >> >> It forces a choice when there is a solution where things can coexist. > > There are multiple ways of coexisting and the configuration changing > based on DISTRO_FEATURES doesn't force a choice either.
It does force a choice, since you don't want to change DISTRO_FEATURES when distributing binaries. If changing it is safe, then it isn't a DISTRO_FEATURE. regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
