On 11/08/2011 06:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:10 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
All,
Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around with some
Clutter based software.
The interesting pieces may be:
Clutter 1.8 series recipes - do we want/need to keep clutter 1.6 around?
Are we OK with continuing to namespace the clutter recipes by clutter
version?
Yes, I think this makes sense.
Why do we want to continue the clutter the namespace with version
numbers? Was this not for a past issue with mis-matched API/ABI?
If that problem is solved, then next remove that version info.
Sau!
Gconf - I've pulled in GConf from upstream as the D-Bus backend is maintained
there now. For this I pulled in the gnome-related classes from meta-oe as they
simplified this recipe and I've been wanting to see them merged for some time.
I had to drop this patch as the gnome classes need a bit more work. I'd
like to get gconf resolved though.
Pulseaudio - whilst adding a required build dependency I changed the recipe so
that it doesn't require X unless the X11 distro feature is enabled.
So I merged the series apart from the gnome class and gconf pieces.
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
