Not really. For native/nativesdk builds mesa-gl is not a viable
alternative to mesa, as it lacks all of the bits that make accelerated
qemu possible. Using PREFERRED_PROVIDER would imply otherwise. I added
this to the commit message.

Alex

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 17:10, Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't a preferred provider would sort this?
>
> Ross
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 15:06, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-gl_18.1.9.bb | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-gl_18.1.9.bb 
>> b/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-gl_18.1.9.bb
>> index 73267eb4f0d..030db6c1440 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-gl_18.1.9.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-gl_18.1.9.bb
>> @@ -7,3 +7,5 @@ PROVIDES = "virtual/libgl virtual/mesa"
>>  S = "${WORKDIR}/mesa-${PV}"
>>
>>  PACKAGECONFIG ??= "opengl dri ${@bb.utils.filter('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', 
>> d)}"
>> +
>> +BBCLASSEXTEND_remove = "nativesdk"
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to