On 2/13/19 5:00 AM, Jonas Bonn wrote:
On 11/02/2019 13:15, [email protected] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:08:46PM +0000, André Draszik wrote:
Please ignore this patch. Looks like a red-herring. Sorry for the noise.
FWIW, I would like to see this patch merged. Had some issues in the past
with busybox umount and added same change as a bbappend.
I'm also carrying a patch locally for this with the following explanation:
systemd passes the "-c" parameter (do not canonicalize) to the umount
command and busybox's umount does not understand this parameter.
With the current busybox do you really still see a problem since
busybox umount has been told to ignore "-c" now:
https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=426134128112738c97a665170b21153ef0764b7d
umount: ignore -c
"-c, --no-canonicalize: Do not canonicalize paths."
As busybox doesn't canonicalize paths in the first place it is safe to
ignore
this option.
See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7786
Signed-off-by: Shawn Landden <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
and that's released in:
$ git tag --contains 426134128112738c97a665170b21153ef0764b7d
1_29_0
1_29_1
1_29_2
1_29_3
1_30_0
and we have:
meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox_1.29.3.bb
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
