Patch has been accepted, so we need to cherry-pick the patch I mentioned.

Ross

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 20:26, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> I'm also not convinced this was right and have submitted
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2019-February/215791.html.
> When that is reviewed we'll know whether this change is fine, or we
> should pick a the patch.
>
> Ross
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 19:04, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > So far:
> >
> > <dcbaker>rburton: according to this commit it's intentional:
> > cc15460e182148292be877bec5a8a61cec57377d
> > <dcbaker>although I'm not sure that patch was correct now, it looks
> > like autotools has generated a 1.1.0 since 2014
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 18:54, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > packages/corei7-64-poky-linux/mesa/libgles1-mesa: FILELIST: removed
> > > "/usr/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.1.0", added
> > > "/usr/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.0.0"
> > >
> > > Is that intentional?  Looks like a version mistake in the meson.build.
> > >
> > > Ross
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to