On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:45 PM Armin Kuster <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This reverts commit a384248938ea9db096866bf4ec8678d35ca62a12. > > > > This package update slipped in doing the maint process. Removing it. <snip> > Just my opinion - don't consider this as NAK. > > * I already fixed the recipes that failed for me. For at least one the > change is no more compatible to 1.68.0. > * This makes PV going backwards > > Thanks for addressing - what do others think?
I'm not using thud yet, but updating boost in stable branch would break too many things and I would have to revert that change in our trees. Some boost updates are in the end quite trivial and just require recompiling everything but still, I would prefer that boost is not updated in stable branches unless there is a huge security/stability issue with the old version. Hope this helps, -Mikko -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
