On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 01:17:11PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 13:15, Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 12:07, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > The problem with setting PV properly, is that 2.32 is less than 2.32.0 > > > and will cause the 'version going backwards' problem. But if RP/Khem > > > are fine with it, I would prefer your patch. > > > > I just had a look at the code in bitbake and yes, it actually even > > tests that 1 < 1.0. I'd say that there's an argument for handling .0 > > releases specially and considering 2.32 == 2.32.0. > > Of course that test exists for people using feeds, and at least dpkg > thinks 2.32 < 2.32.0, so even if we changed the test the feed would > still be broken.
Breaking feeds on purpose is bad, so this is a case to pump PE? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
