Yes, that is fine. Let me know if something is not clear in that test case.
Btw, the apt version we have is badly out of date (and has a significant security issue I think) so if you can update that, that’d be awesome. Alex > On 2 Apr 2019, at 9.36, Xavier Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alexender, > > I'm working on test case but I've a lot of things to understand (and setup to > perform). > I'm basically taking dnf as example and creating a test for apt. Please let > me know if you think my strategy is not correct. > > I'll let you know here when it will work. > > Xavier > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > Sent: lundi 1 avril 2019 16:50 > To: Xavier Berger <[email protected]> > Cc: OE-core <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PULL][PATCH 0/2] Implement debian packages GPG signing > >> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Xavier Berger <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Xavier Berger (2): >> gpg-sign: Add parameters to gpg signature function >> package_manager: sign DEB package feeds >> >> meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py | 6 +++++- >> meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > > How do we make sure this does not regress? Can you add a test case similar to > one for rpm feed signing? > > Alex -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
