> Am 03.04.2019 um 19:10 schrieb richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org: > > On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 19:05 +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> >> >>> Am 03.04.2019 um 15:58 schrieb Richard Purdie < >>> richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>: >>> >>> On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 15:18 +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: >>>> In case, kernel config enables compressed modules, support of >>>> splitting via split_kernel_module_packages won't find any module. >>>> So, first expand module pattern regex to recognize compressed >>>> modules and then objcopy on temporary extacted to extract module >>>> information. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <s...@netbsd.org> >>>> --- >>>> meta/classes/kernel-module-split.bbclass | 36 +++++++++++++++++ >>>> ----- >>>> -- >>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> There is a lot of whitespace noise in this, could you clean that up >>> and >>> resend please? >> >> It's because of <tab>s were replaced with spaces - which is >> reasonable when python code is mixed in. >> Sure that you want keep the tab's? > > Rightly or wrongly, the style convention for OE-Core is tabs in shell, > spaces in python (I'd prefer not to open that can of worms again right > now).
That wasn't the intension - I just wanted to be sure. > Whitespace changes need to be in a separate patch to code changes > regardless. Understood. Cheers -- Jens Rehsack - rehs...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
