On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 10:03:03 +0200
Andreas Müller <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:18 AM <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 18:59 -0500, Seebs wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:12:54 +0100
> > > Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > -SRCREV = "6294b344e5140f5467e6860f45a174440015304e"
> > > > +SRCREV = "6ebc7d6bc8ab973d0ba949eeb363821811ce8dc5"
> > >
> > > I would sort of recommend one of the two commits since then -- one
> > > may
> > > fix the .NET startup failures, and the other fixes warnings that
> > > this one introduced and I forgot to fix. But I'm also okay with
> > > this one.
> >
> > That is good news. I've tested and updated to the later revision,
> > thanks!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Richard
> >
> Hi,
> 
> If you want a happy weekend - stop reading here.
> 
> But somebody has to do widen the audience...
> 
> Seems that this commit causes issues on meta-qt5 / qtbase [1]. To make
> it worse it seems that only some host configurations are affected...
> 
> Cheers
> 
> [1] https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/issues/187
> 
> Andreas

My guess from looking at it is that qmake is using renameat2 and isn't
falling back to something else if renameat2 fails with ENOSYS.

-s
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to