On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:56 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Matthew McClintock <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > +# we also add this to the PV so its clear in filenames
> > +# that this is arch specific even though it's labeled as
> > +# a target package
> > +PV .= "+${BUILD_ARCH_EXPANDED}"
>
> Seems like based on discussion this should be the following instead:
>
> PN .= "-{BUILD_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
What we really want is something like this in cross.bbclass:
MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS = "${BUILD_ARCH}${BUILD_VENDOR}-${BUILD_OS}"
PN .= "-${TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH}"
so that WORKDIR gets changed. I've not tested what this does to the
build though.
Also, looking at sstate.bbclass it does:
elif bb.data.inherits_class('cross', d):
bb.data.setVar('SSTATE_PKGARCH',
bb.data.expand("${BUILD_ARCH}_${TUNE_PKGARCH}", d), d)
bb.data.setVar('SSTATE_MANMACH',
bb.data.expand("${BUILD_ARCH}_${MACHINE}", d), d)
so it should be sticking BUILD_ARCH into the sstate file name directly.
This should mean you can't use 32 bit sstate files on a 64 bit system
and vice versa already?
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
