On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 08:04 +0100, Anders Darander wrote: > Any more comment on this one? Otavio replied earlier that if it was a > small cost, he would prefer to have it on by default. Otherwise, any > suggestions for DISTRO/IMAGE_FEATURE?
We've talked about this a few times in the past and it's never seemed as though this would buy much in relation to busybox. The busybox configuration is so highly specific that each DISTRO is probably going to end up wanting its own custom configuration file and it isn't obvious that there is going to be much/any commonality between them. That being the case it seems as though it's easier for the distros to actually ship the config files themselves, rather than try to translate every conceivable option into PACKAGE_CONFIG and then express them that way. I guess the other thing that naturally follows from this is that there probably aren't very many people using the actual defconfig that oe-core provides, and hence it probably doesn't matter all that much what is and isn't enabled in it. Enabling FEATURE_SYSTEMD seems like a reasonable idea if there is already the mechanism in oe-core to make use of it, but probably just a waste of space otherwise. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
