On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:46 AM Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 15:41 +0100, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <[email protected]> > > --- > > .../ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20190110.bb | 4 > > +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/ca-certificates/ca- > > certificates_20190110.bb b/meta/recipes-support/ca-certificates/ca- > > certificates_20190110.bb > > index 4c0425302f..7c06573db2 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-support/ca-certificates/ca- > > certificates_20190110.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/ca-certificates/ca- > > certificates_20190110.bb > > @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ do_install_append_class-native () { > > SYSROOT="${D}${base_prefix}" ${D}${sbindir}/update-ca- > > certificates > > } > > > > -RDEPENDS_${PN} += "openssl" > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}_class-target = "openssl-bin" > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}_class-native = "openssl" > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}_class-nativesdk = "openssl" > > Wouldn't the nativesdk version be openssl-bin too? > > or really these would end up being openssl-native and > nativesdk-openssl-bin?
What was the reason for moving the openssl binary into a different package in openssl 1.1? As far as I can tell from the mailing list and git history the change landed without any discussed or explanation. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
