On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 15:05 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> I guess the patch needs a small tweak so that swrast remains enabled,
> but becomes optional. Then Marco can set packageconfig exactly as he
> wants.

I guess if we can track down where the swrast dependency is coming and
and change things to avoid it, that would probably be ok.

I tend to think swrast is in a better state that it is in reality :(.

> The second patch is fine as it is, I think. Only qemu implements
> virgl device at the moment.

The second patch should be fine, I had to drop it as it depends on the
first though.

Cheers,

Richard

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to