On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 3:51 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 10:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 10:06 +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:48 AM Luca Boccassi < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > Thanks Richard - in case it helps, we've been using this patch > > > > for a few months at $work (on top of sumo) and it seems to work > > > > fine. > > > > > > > > > > I expect that's true for everyone touching stuff in this class - it > > > works fine for them... the problem is everyone else, since it's > > > terribly fragile and has no tests. > > > > > > I'd not be at all surprised if changing the default from sha1 to > > > sha256 doesn't break someone. > > > > Keeping the default to sha1 would be fine by me, it's the ability to > > configure it that is useful. > > Its merged and it probably makes sense to change the default, I just > continue to worry about how we can test this class and make sure the > commonly used workflows continue to work... >
I've a bunch of stuff I need to get out of the door at the moment, but once that's out of the way, I'm going to see if I can get qemu + U-Boot + FIT image as part of a test image as a starting point. -- Alex Kiernan -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
