On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:44 AM Richard Purdie < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 10:29 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This removes clearly incorrect musl patches and marks > > systemd as incompatible with musl until these issues > > are fixed. > > > > The previous status quo where systemd was made compiling > > with patches that are known to introduce bugs and security > > vulnerabilities silently delivered a sub-standard package > > to users, this change makes it clear where work is needed > > to be done by people interested in systemd on musl. > > > > Patches that are merely questionable or not upstreamable > > are not touched. > > I'll be interested to see what others think of this, I can't imagine > this move being very popular... > There are real products using this combination And this is not a good message, eventually we want to either fix or stop supporting this but I think now is not the time > > You can make arguments both ways. > > Cheers, > > Richard > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
