This is awesome! On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 12:39, Nathan Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > | gcc | g++ | libstdc++ | binutils | gas > | ld | glibc > x86-64 | 589/135169 | 457/131913 | 1/13008 | 0/ 236 | 0/ > 1256 | 166/ 1975 | 1423/ 5991 > arm | 469/123905 | 365/128416 | 19/12788 | 0/ 191 | 0/ > 872 | 155/ 1479 | 64/ 5130 > aarch64 | 460/130904 | 364/128977 | 1/12789 | 0/ 190 | 0/ > 442 | 157/ 1474 | 76/ 5882 > powerpc | 18336/116624 | 6747/128636 | 33/12996 | 0/ 187 | 1/ > 265 | 157/ 1352 | 1218/ 5110 > mips64 | 1174/134744 | 401/130195 | 22/12780 | 0/ 213 | 43/ > 7245 | 803/ 1634 | 2032/ 5847 > riscv64 | 456/106399 | 376/128427 | 1/12748 | 0/ 185 | 0/ > 257 | 152/ 1062 | 88/ 5847
So what I'm really interested in is what those numbers look like for e.g. x86-64 on real hardware: are the test suites always failing a bit, or are these indicative of problems we've introduced? Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
