On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:57:42AM +0100, [email protected]
wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 12:51 +0200, Ulrich Ölmann wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 17 2019 at 11:19 +0200, Richard Purdie <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 15:54 +0200, Ulrich Ölmann wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > -PACKAGECONFIG ??= "gzip xz lzo lz4 lzma xattr"
> > > > +PACKAGECONFIG ??= "gzip xz lzo lz4 lzma xattr zstd reproducible"
> > > > [...]
> > > > +PACKAGECONFIG[zstd] = "ZSTD_SUPPORT=1,ZSTD_SUPPORT=0,zstd"
> > > > +PACKAGECONFIG[reproducible] =
> > > > "REPRODUCIBLE_DEFAULT=1,REPRODUCIBLE_DEFAULT=0,"
> > >
> > > This fails in OE-Core since zstd isn't present and you've enabled
> > > that
> > > by default:
> > >
> > > e.g.:
> > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/65/builds/827
> > >
> > > (but many other similar failures).
> > >
> > > Adding the PACKAGECONFIG[zstd] is good, we just can't enable it by
> > > default.
> >
> > see my reply to Adrian: what do you think of transplanting the zstd
> > recipe from meta-rauc to OE-core?
>
> I think right now that zstd is not common enough to be something for
> oe-core. If multiple people reply and disagree I'm willing to reasses
> that but that's my feeling right now...
zstd not even being in meta-oe is a surprise that should be corrected.
btrfs-tools would be the only user that comes immediately into my mind,
but zstd support in the kernel btrfs driver is relatively new and not
yet widely used.
zstd has already gotten a lot of traction in the Open Source world,
but regarding adding it to oe-core right now one could argue either way.
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
