Hi Hongzhi, > > ... > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ > > > b/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0001-getrlimit03-adjust-a-bit-of-code-to-compatiable-with.patch > > > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ > > > +From e79652a3839869b1983d65999e5d5dcb50bc9cd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > +From: "Hongzhi.Song" <[email protected]> > > > +Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 03:39:06 -0400 > > > +Subject: [PATCH] getrlimit03: adjust a bit of code to compatiable with > > > mips32 > > ... > > > +Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <[email protected]> > > > +Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song <[email protected]> > > > + > > > +Upstream-Status: Backport > > > +Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song <[email protected]> > > > +--- > > > + testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c | 8 +++++++- > > > + 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > I have to say I prefer policy when only build fixes are backported / added. > > (approach which e.g. buildroot has). Having many patches (25 atm) makes > > updating > > a bit difficult (ok, not that much, 'Upstream-Status: Backport' shows what > > has > > been merged since last release) and sometimes brings users patches which > > weren't > > accepted by upstream (your mips patch [1] was not accepted [2]
> Thanks for your kindly remind. > Agree with you. It's time to uprev ltp recipe. > From now, if the "Submitting or Backport" is appropriate, > I will make sure the patch was merged by ltp before it was sent to oe-core. Great! Feel free to Cc me when sending patches. > > ). > > But I understand that LTP 3 months release cycle can be to > > slow for some LTP users. > > Kind regards, > > Petr > > PS: I'm slowly working on fixing all musl issues in LTP upstream. It's a > > long > > term run but were moving towards that goal. > > Patch "build: Add option to select libc implementation" [3] is a not a good > > approach. Instead it's needed to find for each failure why it's not > > presented > > in musl. Mostly because it uses non POSIX features or deprecated API, which > > needs to be avoided or used kernel headers where it's available. > > [1] > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0001-open_posix_testsuite-mmap24-2-Relax-condition-a-bit.patch > I am working on this patch. Good. > > [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/982194/#2012168 > This patch has been merge by ltp finally. To LTP upstream? I don't see it [4]. That's the patch you working on. > --Hongzhi > > [3] > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0004-build-Add-option-to-select-libc-implementation.patch [4] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commits/master/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/24-2.c -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
