On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:24 AM Richard Purdie < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 18:20 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 11:00:57AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > ... > > > ++#if !defined(FNM_EXTMATCH) > > > ++# define FNM_EXTMATCH (0) > > > ++#endif > > > ... > > > > As already said in [1] this is expected to result in broken code, > > and the upstream testsuite also confirms this. > > I've taken the patches as they don't make things worse. I am a bit > concerned about a few places musl is building up problematic patches > though (systemd, elfutils, ltp come to mind). > Yes I am aware of this I think LTP we are upstreaming and I hope this will be better in future Systemd we might have to re-evaluate but I think few patches are worthy of upstreaming elfutils I don’t know yet > > Cheers, > > Richard > >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
