Is there a reason for using "patch" instead of "git am" on let's say the
kernel.
If I want to do some modification, of the kernel, I can like Graeme
description at
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk/2011/05/openembeddedangstrom-kernel-workflow/
do
bitbake -c configure virtual/kernel
and then have an initialized git tree ready to be modified.
"git am" is of course more sensitive to the patch quality than "patch"
but that has some advantages as well.
It also makes the recipe more complex at this stage.
--
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
eMagii
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
