> > Wouldn't it be a bit overkill to add a new class just to handle SRC_URI? I > > would think it would just be a little extra code inside > write_latest_srcrev. > > Ordinarily I'd say yes. But RP had concerns that these changes add up and > unless everyone wants them it could prove to be a maintenance problem. At the > time he wanted a system for people to opt in to new functionality. (I'm not > trying to speak for him, just repeating what I was told when I asked him a > similar question.) In my case though I was suggesting much more > functionality > then just this one item.
Makes sense. I definitely like the idea of the automatic changelog. For now, as a quick prototype of the basic functionality (capturing SRC_URI), I will do as the bbclass suggests and extend BUILDHISTORY_PRESERVE. Thanks, Chris -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
