On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:31 AM Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:

> On 14/08/2019 23:46, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:42 PM akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/14/19 3:29 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>> libffi 3.1 release has been a bit aged and new architectures, compilers
> >>> have since been come on stage to compile it, we have been carrying
> >>> patches, but its better to use the latest 3.3 rc0 which has lot of
> these
> >>> issues handled and is in good shape.
> >>
> >> Will the RC part cause the PE to be invoked when 3.3 comes out?  I did
> >> this on wireshark and shot myself in the foot.
> >>
> >
> > I am expecting the releases to be 3.3.0  but looking into the history
> > of releases it
> > could be 3.3 so yes you are right, Probably I will renable the recipe
> > to libffi_3.2+3.3-rc0.bb
> > and that should fix this
>
> Set the PV to 3.3~rc0 and 3.3 will sort after it.


I thinking using + terminology is familiar in OE world let’s stick to it

>
>
> Ross
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to