On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 14:34 -0600, Seebs wrote: > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 20:04:44 +0000 > Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Modern distros (e.g. fedora30) are starting to use the new statx() > > syscall through the newly exposed glibc wrapper function in > > software > > like coreutils (e.g. the ls command). Add support to intercept this > > to pseudo. > > I think this should be okay. If there's no real statx() wrapper, the > real_statx() call probably fails, but also things probably won't have > thought it existed/worked.
That was my thinking... > Worth double-checking that things still run with this in place on a > system that doesn't have a statx wrapper, when configuring and > building things like coreutils that will check for it. coreutils looks to be using a standard configure check for the statx function. Even in OE, we'd not want to configure/compile with pseudo loaded and active so I think we should be ok... Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
