On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 15:37 +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
> On 2011年12月07日 18:27, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:58 +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
> >> +PACKAGECONFIG ??= "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', 'x11', '',
> >> d)} \
> >> + ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'directfb', 'directfb',
> >> '', d)}"
> >> +PACKAGECONFIG[x11] = "--with-x,--without-x,${X11DEPENDS}"
> >> +PACKAGECONFIG[directfb] = ",,directfb"
> > Hm, really? I didn't think pango had any inbuilt support for DirectFB.
> > Does this really accomplish anything?
> >
> pango hadn't any inbuilt support for DirectFB.
> PACKAGECONFIG[directfb] = ",,directfb" just express that directfb is
> built by dependence relationship when building an image based on directfb.
Well, right, but if pango isn't using directfb itself then it doesn't
need directfb in its DEPENDS any more than, say, busybox does. DirectFB
will be brought in by the dependency chains for gtk, cairo or whatever
other recipes are actually using it.
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
