On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:33:58PM +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:01, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 15:44, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > The problem here would have been caught with systemd-free and > > > > busybox-free being a check in lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/imagefeatures.py > > > > yes? > > > > > > Yes, and you'd also need to do -c testimage on the image to make sure it > > > boots and has the network up and working. > > > > Yes, but I'm thinking in terms of what to change / add so that it would > > be part of the standard suite. busybox-free but systemd is today, yes? > > I can't parse your question :)
I have to admit I'm guessing at what level of automated run-time testing we normally have today. We sanity test a sysvinit+busybox image with networking, yes? If so, we also do that on systemd and I assume with what I put for the systemd+busybox-free we also do there, yes? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
