On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:50 PM Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 22:17 +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > > On 23/01/2020 21:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted > > > > Firmware-A). > > > > To avoid duplicating efforts of adding very similar recipes to > > > > BSP layers, > > > > add an upstream reference implementation to openembedded-core, > > > > which can be > > > > customized by BSPs, if needed. > > > > > > Isn't this one of the things that Jon Mason is trying to > > > standardize/support in meta-arm ? > > > > > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-arm/tree/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/trusted-firmware-a > > > > > > What's the delta between the two ? > > > > That was precisely my thought too. meta-arm isn't exactly well known > > right now, but ideally it should be a central place for common pieces > > that are specific to ARM hardware (unlike anything that is needed for > > qemuarm itself). > > If its needed by many platforms, I'm not adverse to it being in core so > I have an open mind on core vs. meta-arm. I'm waiting to see what Jon's > thoughts are on that.
My thought was that unless it's needed by qemuarm, etc, it would remain in meta-arm. We're going to have other desirable recipes (e.g., edk2) in the near future. So, this layer would be useful for all Arm BSPs. Thanks, Jon > > Cheers, > > Richard > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
