This would be over-engineering; I highly doubt anyone would want to run
this in qemu for any other architecture than those two. Without kvm or
other HW accelerated virtualization many of those ptests will simply fail
on timeout, and if not, they'll still be running when the heat death of the
universe occurs.

Alex

On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 22:02, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:56 PM Alexander Kanavin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This is only used on x86_64 and arm64 by the autobuilder, so we should
> be fine.
> >
>
> OK. lets set this for those two architectures for now. The image can
> be built beyond Autobuilders for
> other arches as well. Perhaps this setting is a candidate for auto.conf on
> AB
>
> > Alex
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:20 AM Alexander Kanavin
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Particularly, 1G wasn't enough for lttng-tools ptests as
> >> > half of that went to /tmp, and lttng-tools needs more.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]>
> >> > ---
> >> >  meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk-ptest.bb | 3 ++-
> >> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk-ptest.bb
> b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk-ptest.bb
> >> > index 7490b773d2e..58c257c49fb 100644
> >> > --- a/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk-ptest.bb
> >> > +++ b/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk-ptest.bb
> >> > @@ -16,4 +16,5 @@ IMAGE_OVERHEAD_FACTOR = "1.0"
> >> >  IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE = "1124288"
> >> >
> >> >  # ptests need more memory than standard to avoid the OOM killer
> >> > -QB_MEM = "-m 1024"
> >> > +# also lttng-tools needs /tmp that has at least 1G
> >> > +QB_MEM = "-m 2048"
> >>
> >> perhaps we need to be cautious here and check if all qemu machines can
> >> support 2G emulation.
> >>
> >> > --
> >> > 2.17.1
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to