On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 20:47 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Both test_parse_recipe_initial_datastore and the preceding test > operate on the same recipe, and both change recipe metadata and re- > parse > it. In some situations bitbake backend from the first test is > catching the change done by the second test and interprets it as > non-deterministic metadata (not sure if this sentence is entirely > technically correct though :). > > The easiest way to avoid is to make the tests operate on two > different recipes. > > [YOCTO #13812]
I'm not sure its this simple unfortunately. The big question is whether injected changes from the first "session" should persist into the second "session" or whether things should be reset to a consistent state between them. Yes, this will fix the test but I'm not sure its fixing the underlying problem :( Cheers, Richard > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > --- > meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py > b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py > index 42a1b6b4f4..1bbb7eeec7 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ class TinfoilTests(OESelftestTestCase): > def test_parse_recipe_initial_datastore(self): > with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil: > tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False, quiet=2) > - testrecipe = 'mdadm' > + testrecipe = 'psplash' > best = tinfoil.find_best_provider(testrecipe) > if not best: > self.fail('Unable to find recipe providing %s' % > testrecipe) > -- > 2.25.1 > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
