On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 21:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 1:08 PM André Draszik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 16:05 +0000, André Draszik wrote: > > In an ideal world, it'd parse the output of xz --verbose --verbose, > > to catch > > all possible ways people might be adjusting the thread limit, but > > that's > > non-trivial. > > Couldn't we just "enforce" at least two threads? It is quite unlikely > we ever use OE on a single core machine (as it'd take few years to > finish the build hehe) it seems like a reasonable assumption.
An earlier patch does, unless you actually set XZ_THREADS = "1". If you do that, things are still reproducible in that the output will be consistent, just not with any other value of XZ_THREADS. So I think we should be fine without this patch. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
