On Tuesday 13 December 2011 12:40:40 Joshua Lock wrote: > On 13/12/11 12:34, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Joshua Lock <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -SRCREV = "39db46123ed6bbbc3e6ad359a64d4d344ca9e11b" > >> -PV = "1.8.0+git${SRCPV}" > >> +# the 1.8.2 tag > >> +SRCREV = "9041ea42655dfc1422ce88eab931382dd400d13a" > >> +PV = "1.8.2+git${SRCPV}" > > > > you could also use the tag name instead of SHA for SRCREV I think > > Indeed we can, however we've seen problems which I can't recall the > details of in the past when doing so. Therefore I decided to avoid it > this time.
It does work, it just forces a fetch on every parse which is not really desirable. It's really no hardship to use the SHA1 especially if it's accompanied by a comment with the corresponding tag. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
