Hi, On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 17:10 +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > On 20/01/2020 15:45, Khem Raj wrote: > > pseudo needs some love since it alters syscalls which go out of bounds > > what is allowed by libseccomp until then pin your file version to 5.37 > > in arch till a supported distro is affected by same problem. It wont > > be long better option is to fix pseudo > > That's not quite right. pseudo LD_PRELOADs itself into file, and makes > syscalls which are not whitelisted in file's seccomp configuration. > > There's nothing pseudo can do to solve this.
I stumbled across this thread when checking why libseccomp is not in oe-core or meta-oe. It seems to me that pseudo could intercept the seccomp(2) or libseccomps seccomp_* function calls and report them as unsupported to simulate running on a kernel without seccomp support. What am I missing? :) Regards, Jan
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#136878): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/136878 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/72386229/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
