in the vein of the recently-introduced INIT_MANAGER variable, is
there any value in introducing a variable that is short for "i don't
want a hint of busybox in my image"?
i see the equivalent in the same file i mentioned in an earlier
post: meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/imagefeatures.py, with the
corresponding settings:
# Replace busybox
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/base-utils = "packagegroup-core-base-utils"
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_base-utils = "packagegroup-core-base-utils"
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_base-utils-hwclock = "util-linux-hwclock"
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_base-utils-syslog = ""
# Blacklist busybox
PNBLACKLIST[busybox] = "Don't build this"
i ask since a colleague just asked me how to do exactly that --
prevent any trace of busybox being used in the final image.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#137431):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/137431
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/73223838/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
