Hi, Steve,

Is there a repo/branch available where you collect patches for dunfell-next?

Denys


On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:27:45PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> Yes Steve, there are good for Dunfell. We should consider them
> 
> On 4/27/20 4:20 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> >Hi Khem,
> >
> >Is this series something I should consider for dunfell LTS?
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 1:19 PM Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>OE uses libiberty from binutils, since its properly compiled as pic
> >>archive and applications and other libraries needing libiberty can
> >>properly link with it.
> >>
> >>With this option applied, explicit delete of libiberty headers and
> >>libraries is not required in install step, since they wont get installed
> >>in first place.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
> >>---
> >>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc | 1 +
> >>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc   | 6 ------
> >>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc            | 4 ----
> >>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-target.inc           | 4 ----
> >>  4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc 
> >>b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> >>index bb4f6923f2..a64c4caf00 100644
> >>--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> >>+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> >>@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "\
> >>      --enable-libstdcxx-pch \
> >>      --program-prefix=${TARGET_PREFIX} \
> >>      --without-local-prefix \
> >>+    --disable-install-libiberty \
> >>      ${EXTRA_OECONF_BASE} \
> >>      ${EXTRA_OECONF_GCC_FLOAT} \
> >>      ${EXTRA_OECONF_PATHS} \
> >>diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc 
> >>b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc
> >>index 4aac345bec..553ef7fe62 100644
> >>--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc
> >>+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc
> >>@@ -108,12 +108,6 @@ do_install () {
> >>         # We don't care about the gcc-<version> copies
> >>         rm -f ${D}${bindir}/*gcc-?.?*
> >>
> >>-       # We use libiberty from binutils
> >>-       rm -f ${D}${prefix}/${TARGET_SYS}/lib/libiberty.a
> >>-       # Not sure where the strange paths come from
> >>-       rm -f ${D}${libdir}/../lib/libiberty.a
> >>-       rm -f ${D}${libdir}/libiberty.a
> >>-
> >>         # Cleanup empty directories which are not shipped
> >>         # we use rmdir instead of 'rm -f' to ensure the non empty 
> >> directories are not deleted
> >>         # ${D}${libdir}/../lib only seems to appear with SDKMACHINE=i686
> >>diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc 
> >>b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc
> >>index c68cdd5dc4..6fa8c274cd 100644
> >>--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc
> >>+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc
> >>@@ -117,10 +117,6 @@ do_install () {
> >>         cp ${S}/libquadmath/quadmath.h 
> >> ${D}${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include/
> >>         cp ${S}/libquadmath/quadmath_weak.h 
> >> ${D}${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include/
> >>
> >>-       # We use libiberty from binutils
> >>-       find ${D}${exec_prefix}/lib -name libiberty.a | xargs rm -f
> >>-       find ${D}${exec_prefix}/lib -name libiberty.h | xargs rm -f
> >>-
> >>         find ${D}${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include-fixed -type f 
> >> -not -name "README" -not -name limits.h -not -name syslimits.h | xargs rm 
> >> -f
> >>  }
> >>
> >>diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-target.inc 
> >>b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-target.inc
> >>index 34c1b2263b..8cb432780f 100644
> >>--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-target.inc
> >>+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-target.inc
> >>@@ -192,10 +192,6 @@ do_install () {
> >>         # We don't care about the gcc-<version> ones for this
> >>         rm -f *gcc-?.?*
> >>
> >>-       # We use libiberty from binutils
> >>-       find ${D}${libdir} -name libiberty.a | xargs rm -f
> >>-       find ${D}${libdir} -name libiberty.h | xargs rm -f
> >>-
> >>         # Not sure why we end up with these but we don't want them...
> >>         rm -f ${TARGET_PREFIX}${TARGET_PREFIX}*
> >>
> >>--
> >>2.26.1
> >>
> >>

> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#137545): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/137545
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/73045310/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to