On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:02 PM Steve Sakoman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:30 AM Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:20:40PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/7/20 12:57 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 12:44:15PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 5/3/20 3:51 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> > > >>> Should I consider these two patches for dunfell LTS?
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes I think they are fixing a problem and are safe.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think it is safe though!
> > > >
> > > > The code has been moved to create_sdk_files() which is a POSTPROCESS 
> > > > command
> > > > for SDK creation. What if SDK already provides own /etc/ld.so.conf? The 
> > > > code
> > > > just simply overwrites it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > but are there such usecases ? looking closely if SDK is extending the
> > > ld.so.conf then they should be appending to it instead of overwriting
> > > and same is true for this patch for master.
> >
> > Exactly my point - should probably append, not overwrite.
> > As of usecases - I can think of a non-standard nativesdk tool that adjusts
> > /etc/ld.so.conf during install...
>
> I think you've convinced me to pass on this for dunfell (at least in
> the short term)
>
> If a patch is submitted that appends rather than overwrites I'll
> consider the series again once it makes it into master.
>

yes, I think that will be right thing to do although I think it fills
in a good gap in dunfell
but as it is might not work as expected.

> If you submit such a patch please tag it with [dunfell] too.
>
> Thanks for the comments!
>
> Steve
> > 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#138041): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138041
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/73326300/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to