Issue has been fixed in valgrind itself

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
---
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc        |  3 +-
 ...se-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch | 47 -------------------
 ...mic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch} |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
 rename 
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/{0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
 => 0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch} (96%)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
index 82b5a20a42..041d426187 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
@@ -65,8 +65,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
            
file://0035-gentypes-genmodes-Do-not-use-__LINE__-for-maintainin.patch \
            file://0036-Enable-CET-in-cross-compiler-if-possible.patch \
            file://0037-mingw32-Enable-operation_not_supported.patch \
-           
file://0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch \
-           file://0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch \
+           file://0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch \
 "
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
"b6898a23844b656f1b68691c5c012036c2e694ac4b53a8918d4712ad876e7ea2"
 
diff --git 
a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index fc9228277a..0000000000
--- 
a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-From 2101fb718935c7cf1cc2ad201bdeb1e635b54b0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 11:03:41 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[AArch64] Use __getauxval instead of getauxval in LSE
- detection code in libgcc"
-
-This reverts commit 5a57016dd2758cc63a544f191f77635342397a72.
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
----
- libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c | 17 ++++++++---------
- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c 
b/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
-index 00e9ab8cd1c..74acef25cce 100644
---- a/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
-+++ b/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
-@@ -29,20 +29,19 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively.  
If not, see
- _Bool __aarch64_have_lse_atomics
-   __attribute__((visibility("hidden"), nocommon));
- 
--/* Gate availability of __getauxval on glibc.  All AArch64-supporting glibc
--   versions support it.  */
--#ifdef __gnu_linux__
-+/* Disable initialization of __aarch64_have_lse_atomics during bootstrap.  */
-+#if !defined(inhibit_libc) && defined(HAVE_SYS_AUXV_H)
-+# include <sys/auxv.h>
- 
--# define AT_HWCAP     16
--# define HWCAP_ATOMICS        (1 << 8)
--
--unsigned long int __getauxval (unsigned long int);
-+/* Disable initialization if the system headers are too old.  */
-+# if defined(AT_HWCAP) && defined(HWCAP_ATOMICS)
- 
- static void __attribute__((constructor))
- init_have_lse_atomics (void)
- {
--  unsigned long hwcap = __getauxval (AT_HWCAP);
-+  unsigned long hwcap = getauxval (AT_HWCAP);
-   __aarch64_have_lse_atomics = (hwcap & HWCAP_ATOMICS) != 0;
- }
- 
--#endif /* __gnu_linux__  */
-+# endif /* HWCAP */
-+#endif /* inhibit_libc */
diff --git 
a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
similarity index 96%
rename from 
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
rename to 
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
index fecb562f51..3946acea11 100644
--- 
a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
+++ 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-From 411fc85c14bb14b07c0db807c55d25ce3f3e507f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 38d262bfe7c0c894c364dc6e4dc7971e78a73974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
 Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:10:38 -0700
 Subject: [PATCH] libatomic: Do not enforce march on aarch64
-- 
2.26.2

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#138281): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138281
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74210282/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to