Hello Gregor, On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:09:25 +0200 "Gregor Zatko" <[email protected]> wrote:
> In some cases there is a need for update-alternatives script which gets built > within opkg-utils recipe into a standalone package. However, this causes to > many unnecessary dependencies, including Python, bc, OpenSSL etc. to be built. > > In this commit a standalone lightweight recipe for update-alternatives that > shouldn't be dependent on nothing other than bash. > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8879 > > Signed-off-by: Gregor Zatko <[email protected]> > --- > .../conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc | 6 +-- > meta/conf/layer.conf | 3 +- > .../packagegroups/packagegroup-self-hosted.bb | 1 + > .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils_0.4.2.bb | 25 +--------- > .../update-alternatives_0.4.2.bb | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ why did you change the name from update-alternatives-opkg to update-alternatives? I would prefer to keep the suffix in order to be able to distinguish it more easily from other implementations, e.g. dpkg's. Best regards, Andreas
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#139114): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139114 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74635039/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
