On 12/19/2011 04:54 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 19 dec. 2011, om 13:47 heeft Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov het volgende geschreven:
On 12/19/2011 12:13 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 18 dec. 2011, om 20:47 heeft Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov het volgende geschreven:
As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to
separate task from do_deploy. This way the do_install task can also
benefit from generated uImage.
The only major feature of oe-core's version (not to recreate uImage
if it exists) is retained in this patch.
I still don't agree with that behaviour. The in-kernel uImage code is just like
the in-kernel defconfigs: useless for people who aren't kernel developers.
Koen, that was addressed with KERNEL_RECREATE_UIMAGE variable.
Probably I should document it somewhere (in the commit message?
documentation.conf? smwh. else?). Would you agree with this patch + docs?
No. If the machine.conf sets the UBOOT_* variables I should not need some magic
unbreak-me variable to get kernel.bbclass to use them.
I see your point. I'll redo it so.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
